As to the vest,or waistcoat,as he would often call it I always figured it was just part of his suit. It was but had a function of its own besides being fashionable. It was to cover the suspenders ! Believe it or not suspenders were once considered underwear and not to be seen in polite company ! The common working man,being crass and uncouth.may expose his suspenders but a gentleman never did. Also it is not proper to wear suspenders and a belt. One or the other never both. Reading about the subject I discovered belts never really became the norm or popular until after WW1.
At an earlier time frame the waistcoat also functioned as a corset. It had whalebone stays and laced up the back. Just as a woman's corset it gave you a slimmer waist instantly. This was before my Great Grandfathers time and I wonder what he would have thought about that.
My Great Grandfather never left his home without his suit jacket on. He carried a cane and always wore a hat. A proper gentleman. I have seen photographs of him working in the garden and he wasn't wearing his waistcoat then and his suspenders were showing ! Perhaps that is what attracted Great Grandmother to him. A sexy figure for the times I am sure. Funny how things change that way. Suspenders as underwear ? Now you see underwear all the time as a fashion statement.
My grandfather wore leg garters to keep his socks up. I assume that's because they didn't have elastic thread like they do now to give them so much give but I don't know. I guess it was not polite to show any leg even for men so they made sure their socks were always pulled high by wearing the garters. Just guessing!
ReplyDelete