Social media. A fairly new term to describe the platforms we use to interact with each other digitally. I'm so old I recall when that meant writing a letter or postcard. Well, the digital part anyway. Used to be we sat and got out our stationary and began writing. Some thought usually went into what was being written, it wasn't a spur of the moment type thing, more of a reasoned response. Today in this world of instantaneous communication that isn't always the case. In fact, I would suggest that 75% of what is posted is "off the cuff" as the saying goes. You read to react, not to understand the thought being presented. Whatever catches your attention. Also the reason for so many advertisements, meme's, and salacious headlines. I'm not trying to say I don't fall prey to all of that, I've been guilty on more than one occasion, but I do try to present something that will at the very least give pause, make you think about what I'm saying. It rarely works though.
Yesterday was a case in point. I had posted about this being Pride month. I had gone to the internet to receive an explanation of just what Pride month is supposed to be representing. The gist of that explanation was to celebrate the contributions and accomplishments of those in the LGTBQ community. I asked, what have those folks contributed or accomplished that others have not. That is what I wrote. An argument immediately broke out about all of that. The problem being, I had dared to question that, dared to question the narrative of Gay pride. You are expected to throw your full support and praise behind that. Failure to do so will quickly get you labeled as all sorts of vile things. The thing is, if you read what I wrote I was just asking what special or unique skill or contributions has that community made? Their title identifies there sexual preference's, is that a contribution or accomplishment? I don't think so, it's just their choice.
But all of that devolved into a discussion of being oppressed, marginalized, white supremacy and the evils of slavery. Yes, all those things were mentioned as justification for a Pride month. Well, because there are those that do not agree with those life choices and get offended when that is presented as something to celebrate. I don't like lima beans, I don't hate Lima beans. I will not attend any celebration for Lima beans, you are however, free to partake. Is Pride month supposed to be some abject lesson in morality? An entire month devoted to telling us that we should celebrate what we don't agree with because that is the only moral thing to do. The imposition of your moral choices on others isn't tolerance or acceptance, it is bullying. To further suggest that it is some kind of accomplishment or contribution is an insult. Being Gay isn't some 20th or 21st century accomplishment or contribution. There have always been those that chose that preference. That's the reason there are so many letters identifying that "community."
What turns you on is a very personal thing, and should remain that way. We don't need a month to celebrate all of that. Whatever contribution or accomplishment you achieve beyond that, may or may not be celebrated by others. I don't need to know your personal choices to celebrate your accomplishments. It isn't "being in the closet" it is exercising discretion and sound judgement. It's as simple as that. Those celebrating their Pride are in the minority, less than 14% of the population in fact, they really shouldn't be surprised when the other 86% don't want to celebrate that as an accomplishment or contribution. It really isn't relevant. In fact, you could view that as pandering. It's really like saying, I have Black friends. And that is the point I was attempting to make. But, you're not supposed to do that today!
Now if I were to post this missive on a social media platform like Facebook how much of it would actually be read? According to one study, any more than 80 characters and the engagement drops off swiftly. Just eighty characters, that isn't a lot of words. On average that is four sentences, including spaces. Perhaps that is the reason for all these acronyms in play today and the use of emojis. That wasn't the case when we wrote letters to one another, or published pamphlets and books. Maybe this started with the Readers Digest condensed books. Some of the story is missing. I've found, generally speaking, that folks aren't accepting my synopsis when I post something like that. I just think they need to read the whole thing. I mean a postcard is great, but a letter is better. Maybe that's the problem today, no one is getting letters anymore. Lots of folks interested in putting letters after their name but not interested in understanding the subject at hand.